Rockstar's consistent behaviors show it.
Rockstar is rumored to have delayed both Xbox 360 and PS3 versions of Grand Theft Auto IV for Sony's sake. It also has two new exclusives in the pipeline for Sony (i.e., L.A. Noire and an unannounced but known project.) On the other hand, Microsoft gets no such special treatment from Rockstars. The only way for Microsoft to get any attention from Rockstar is to pay Rockstar huge sums of money.
All signs point to Rockstar's...
which spreads out and shows the individual contents.
'nuff said.
In 2006, HD-DVD has 62.87% market share, while Blu-ray has 37.13%.
In 2007, HD-DVD has 38.22% market share, while Blu-ray has 61.78%.
In just one year, we have a complete reversal between HD-DVD and Blu-ray.
If Blu-ray was not dead or losing in 2006 with 37.13% market share,
then HD-DVD is not dead or losing in 2007 with 38.22% market share.
And we can have another complete reverse, again, in 2008.
Wii and PS3 compete for the same development money. When a game publisher or developer spends money, time and manpower on making a Wii game, that means less money, time and manpower for PS3/360 game development. In that sense, Wii takes away development money, attention and effort that could be spent on PS3.
See a pattern?
It's owned by Time Turner since the 1990s.
AIDS.
It's a photo of Master Chief's obituary.
He took some games from GamePro list and mixed them with his own opinion. That's the list in his blog.
BTW, the correct spelling is Boba Fett with an "e".
Sony cuts prices. Microsoft cuts prices. Then Sony cuts more prices. Then Microsoft cuts even more prices.
Who win? WE! We the consumers win!
So why are Sony and PS3 fanboys so angry and bitter when Xbox 360 has a price cut? They should be happy because Sony will be forced to cut prices on PS3 as well - and when that happens, we the consumers win!
Who win? WE! We the consumers win!
So why do you sound so bitter?
The article already specifically states that the story image is not an actual price cut.
TBA 2008 Too Human Microsoft Adventure
Don't particularly care about UK because the link here in this story points to the US page.
The list says "TBA 2008" for Too Human.
and Microsoft allowed the Mac version to be made because Microsoft owns Bungie. Why Microsoft would allow Halo to be ported to Mac is beyond me.
BTW, don't be an idiot, we all know that DS is way, way more popular than PSP.
Microsoft will publish (or distribute) the localized version of Bioshock in Japan, that means Microsoft somehow has a financial stake in this game, and it will not be on PS3.
Rare used to make only Nintendo games, remember?
I think it's a mistake for Microsoft to buy Rare in the first place. Rare does not deserve the financial backing.
Where are the COLORS? Is Halo 3 becoming like Killzone 2??
PS3 does not even have any exclusive WRPG in the pipeline. It's not coming. No WRPG has been planned for PS3. There's nothing. Nada. Not a zit.
And Bioware is not working on a single-player WRPG for PS3. Can you even give me the title of this supposedly exclusive RPG? No? That's it's just another rumor, like MGS4 is coming to 360. You guys have been saying that forever, and that hasn't happened. You said Bioware was going to announced a PS3 exclusive for PS3 at E3. E3...
I counted about four or five good exclusives in that list:
Lair
Heavenly Sword
Folklore
Warhawk (doesn't really interest me, but I suppose it does for other people.)
One that's iffy:
Uncharted: Drake's Fortune (November? Very unlikely. Next year is more likely)
All the others are already on Xbox 360 first (Ghost Recon: Advanced WarFighter 2, DiRT), will be out for Xbox 360 the same time (Assassin's Creed), or will be on Xbox 360...